One Republican vs. twenty-five Kamala Harris voters, who would win?
Jubilee is a YouTube Channel dedicated to producing political and social videos. The channel started in 2017 and has amassed a large amount of followers, becoming a main staple of pop culture. The channel thrives on bringing together people with different opinions and beliefs, trying to find a common ground between them.
An interesting development with the channel is the political videos they have been publishing due to the recent election. Publishing videos with participating members of the Democrat or Republican party debating with people from the opposing side.
AP Government Teacher Russell Rudman said, “It’s not real journalism. Without any statement of financial neutrality, it’s worthless.” His view exposes a common perspective around Jubilee videos – that Jubilee may be influenced by other political groups and are not doing fair videos for the millions of viewers the channel commonly has, giving false info to consumers.
The increased exposure of Jubilee has promoted the creation of reaction videos on social media platforms like Youtube and Tiktok, leading to the channel becoming massively popular with Jubilee’s account at about 9.4 million subscribers as of November 2024. Jubilee attempts to fight criticism regarding their large influence by fact checking in the description of their videos, a policy administered by the company staff under Jason Y. Lee, the creator and current owner.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13cf6/13cf61bc8ca808586d3dd667c0d5ec47b049d31d" alt=""
Jubilee also makes other types of videos, including a series called “Test Your Radar,” where someone has to try and guess if people fit a specific social category, such as being heterosexual or homosexual. These series are much more entertainment-based, whereas the policy videos previously mentioned are more informative and “complex”. Other types of videos include the “Circle Of Secrets,” where a demographic shares their own private stories with each other and the internet, effectively for a form of world wide group therapy.
Jubilee watcher and Millikan student Zoe Van Gessel said, “It makes pop culture more polarizing than it already is. I don’t know if it’s an accurate representation of conversations with your peers.” She is essentially stating that Jubilee does not provide a realistic lens of how socialization actually works, and that through this Jubilee adds to the culture divide. This is especially valuable considering the special impact Jubilee viewers have on the channel, as Jubilee is directly influenced by whether or not the viewers enjoy their output.
Evidently, Jubilee has a large social footprint and spins both entertainment and political debate into one consumable product that’s popular with the internet. Many have been able to watch and consume Jubilee as both something to entertain themselves and others, as well as something to gain knowledge from. The prominence of the channel has undeniably risen due to the presidential election, and it’s important to consider the ramifications of such a high-profile channel releasing politically-themed videos. Jubilee has positioned itself within our culture as something that is a prime source of entertainment and information, whether for better or for worse.
Find Jubilee here and watch their videos at this link: https://www.youtube.com/@jubilee?reload=9
Stephanie Chau • Jan 16, 2025 at 1:57 pm
Dear Corydon Editor,
On January 14, 2025, Cole Ritter wrote an article titled “Jubilee Youtube Channel”. Furthermore, Ritter continues to provide details and context that the Youtube Channel has the purpose of creating both political and social content. He empathizes that this kind of content was made to connect people with different beliefs when it comes to more complex topics that may be sensitive to some individuals. In addition to this, he gives other factual based details on the channel such as the fact that it had been established in 2017 and that the company is currency under and owned by Jason Y. Lee. Additionally, Ritter continues to discuss just how popular this channel has become, mentioning that the channel has promoted reaction videos on various social media platforms such as YouTube and TikTok.
Ritter then goes into more detail about the different kinds of videos that have been created for both social and political topics, which can be entertaining and funny to controversial and nerve racking to watch. In order to further advance this kind of content, he had mentioned a series called “Test Your Radar” to discuss whether or not people could tell if an individual would be identified as a heterosexual or homosexual. Another example would be a series called “Circle of Secrets” where members of a small group and the internet are able to hear more about the personal stories of others and how their experiences have influenced them and how they can all heal with the comfort of each other.
Lastly, he includes the opinions and thoughts from other individuals on Millikan campus. First, he adds a mention from AP Government teacher, Russell Rudman, who essentially makes a point that Jubilee isn’t reliable in any way, and it can often spread the wrong information. In addition to this, Ritter adds on by implying that the channel may be biased in some ways, thus making it not credible for any reason. Furthermore, Zoe Van Gessel, another student who watches Jubilee also mentions that she believes that instead of unifying people, Jubilee will actually cause a divide between the people that are involved within the videos along with those who are watching the actual videos. This essentially makes the point that this channel isn’t necessarily good or bad, but impactful.
Wes Aguilar • Jan 15, 2025 at 6:35 pm
On January 14, 2025, Cole Ritter wrote an article titled “Jubilee Youtube Channel”. In this article, he talks about a famous YouTube Channel called “Jubilee” and does an amazing job. I love how he gives background information right away and then jumps into opposing viewpoints. Ritter mentions what Jubilee does and why a majority of people have followed them and then provides excellent statements gathered from interviews.
These interviews are powerful because of the people who he chose. For example, when on the subject of partially political YouTube channels there isn’t a better teacher’s opinion to get than the AP Government teacher. By getting his point of view on the subject it helps uncover some of the truth behind whether Jubilee is spreading fake news or being factual. I also enjoyed how he briefly branched off and talked about the other videos that were being created. This makes the audience know that they make diverse videos and aren’t fully focused on ideas like politics. Also, Ritter didn’t show any bias for or against the channel which helps give the audience a neutral stance, not skewing people to think a certain way.
Overall, I am extremely impressed with Ritter’s article. After reading his article, I think differently about the channel and am more open-minded.
Sincerely,
Wes Aguilar
William Briceno • Jan 15, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Dear Corydon Editor,
On January 14, 2025, Cole Ritter wrote an article called “Jubilee Youtube Channel”. The article did a good job on establishing what Jubilee is and the content that it serves. Throughout the article I enjoyed the idea on how Jubilee affects the people in our generation. Most of the videos are targeted towards our age group so focusing on that is important. The mentioning of the cultural divide was a great way to connect the misleading socialization that Jubilee presents to the real world. I also appreciated how the article incorporated a quote to give an outside voice. The idea that Jubilee may be presenting false information adds more depth to the argument as to whether or not Jubilee is a good influence on our generation. Emphasizing the political aspects of the Youtube channel was also significant as it highlights the way media can feed us an opinion without us realizing it.
Sincerely,
William Briceno
Alexander Hu • Jan 15, 2025 at 1:56 pm
Dear Corydon Editor,
On January 14, 2025, Cole Ritter wrote an article of the name “Jubilee Youtube Channel”. I really like how you presented the information about the Youtube channel and expressed your personal opinions about this topic. Your wording is great and your way of laying out important points, makes it really easy to understand and to think about my opinions on this topic as well. The only concern that I might have is the lack of student opinions and I would think the entry would be better rounded with another students opinion about Jubilee. I also would like to suggest to include how this Youtube channel affects the people who watch this channel as well as spreading beliefs that may not be true. If you include this extra evidence, maybe it could help people better express their feelings towards Jubilee too. Thank you for the entry and I thoroughly enjoyed reading this, when will you make another entry to read?
Pedro Hernandez • Jan 15, 2025 at 1:53 pm
On January 14, 2025, Cole Ritter wrote an article titled “Jubilee Youtube Channel”. This article provides useful context and current information about the YouTube Channel, Jubilee. It points out how not everything said or heard on Jubilee is going to be accurate. It did a great job getting commentary from AP Government teacher Russel Rudman, is a credible source especially in the social and political world. He opposed Jubilee by saying it is not real journalism and it should not be taken as fact. Also, getting commentary from someone who watches Jubilee helps provide a new perspective. It helped me understand that people mainly watch Jubilee for entertainment and they do not all take it seriously. It is very helpful in finding out the positive and negative aspects of watching Jubilee. In all, I believe this article was very useful and informative. I got an understanding of why this channel is so popular.
Rachel Vanderschans • Jan 14, 2025 at 3:34 pm
On January 14, 2025, Cole Ritter wrote an article titled “Jubilee Youtube Channel”. In this article, Ritter talks about the YouTube channel “Juiblee” which produces differing content such as debates between political party groups, and spotting the odd one out in groups of similar people. His article explains why these types of videos aren’t completely accurate and may have more unaffiliated reasons for promoting these certain types of videos than just for entertainment value. Using different interviews, Ritter argues that these videos set unrealistic social expectations and unreliable information regarding politics. As a consumer of these types of videos, I often have noticed how the editors cut things to make certain people appear in a certain way. One thing I consistently see in these videos is how often they make the women who appear seem “irrational” or “emotional.” I have also heard reports of those who are in the videos claiming they are not treated well on set, and how the experience didn’t seem very fair to them. Many claimed it was very intense and that on set it did not seem very organized when it came to the participants. In my opinion, I believe that shortly, there will most likely be some scandal about the channel with many people coming out to share their experiences with it. Until then, I believe many will watch it for a cheap laugh, but not fully understand the content they are consuming.